OETT/
K20Center
School Professional Staff as a
Learning Community Post-Survey
Please insert the last four(4) digits of your SSN:
Gender :
Select One
Male
Female
School Name:
Select One
Alva Independent School District
Beggs MS
Blackwell MS
Francis ES
Carney HS
Cottonwood Schools
Elgin MS
Geary HS
Jones HS
Sadler Arts Academy
Jefferson ES
Longfellow MS
Santa Fe HS
Windsor Hills ES
Smithville Schools
Wright ES
Will Rogers ES
Wanette ES
Watts HS
Woodward MS
School District:
Select One
Alva
Beggs
Blackwell
Byng
Carney
Cottonwood
Elgin
Geary
Jones
Muskogee
Norman
Oklahoma City
Putnam City
Smithville
Tulsa
Vinita
Wanette
Watts
Woodward
Grades you teach:
Select One
PK-2
3-5
K-6
6-8
7-9
9-12
PK-12
Subjects or Assignment :
Select One
All
Administrator
Business
Computers
Counselor
Fine Arts
Foreign Language
Language Arts
Library/Media
Mathematics
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Special Education
Technology
Vocational Agriculture
Other
Self-Contained:
_
yes
no
Years employed as a teacher:
Years employed at your school:
Choose any rating from
1-low to 5 high
School Administrators
participate democratically with teacher sharing power, authority,
and decision making.
1a
Although there are some legal and fiscal decisions required of the
principal, school administrators consistently involve the staff in
discussing and making decisions about most school issues.
5
4
Administrators invite advice and counsel from the staff and
then make decisions themselves.
3
2
Administrators never share information with the staff nor
provide opportunities to be involved in decision making
1
1b
Administrators involve the entire staff.
5
4
Administrators involve a small
committee, council, or team of staff.
3
2
e.
Administrators
do not involve staff.
1
Staff shares
visions for school improvement that have an undeviating focus on
student learning, and are consistently referenced for the staff's
work.
2a
a. Visions
for improvement are discussed by the entire staff such that
consensus and a shared vision results.
5
4
b. Visions
for improvement are not thoroughly explored; some staff agree and
others do not.
3
2
c. Visions
for improvement held by the staff are widely divergent.
1
2b
d. Visions
for improvement are always focused on students and learning and
teaching.
5
4
e. Visions
for improvement are sometimes focused on students and teaching and
learning.
3
2
f. Visions
for improvement do not target students and teaching and learning.
1
Staff's collective learning and
application of the learnings (taking action) create high
intellectual learning tasks and solutions to address student needs.
3a
The entire staff
meets to discuss issues, share information, and learn with and from
each other.
5
4
Subgroups of the
staff meet to discuss issues, share information, and learn with and
from each other.
3
2
Individuals
randomly discuss issues, share information, and learn with and from
each other.
1
3b
The staff
meets regularly and frequently on substantive student-centered
educational issues.
5
4
The staff
meets occasionally on substantive student-centered educational
issues.
3
2
The
staff never meets to consider substantive educational issues.
1
3c
The staff
discusses the quality of their teaching and students' learning.
5
4
The
staff does not often discuss their instructional practices nor its
influence on student learning.
3
2
The
staff basically discusses non-teaching and non-learning issues.
1
3d
The staff,
based on their learnings, makes and implements plans that address
students' needs, more effective teaching, and more successful
student learning.
5
4
The
staff occasionally acts on their learning and makes and implements
plans to improve teaching and learning.
3
2
The staff
does not act on their learning.
1
3e
The
staff debriefs and assesses the impact of their actions and make
revisions.
5
4
The
staff infrequently assesses their actions and seldom makes revisions
based on the results.
3
2
The
staff does not assess their work.
1
Peers review and
give feedback based on observing each other's classroom behaviors in
order to increase individual and organizational capacity.
4a
Staff
regularly and frequently visit and observe each other's classroom
teaching.
5
4
Staff
occasionally visit and observe each other's teaching.
3
2
Staff never
visit their peer's classrooms.
1
4b
Staff provide
feedback to each other about teaching and learning based on their
classroom observations.
5
4
Staff discuss
non-teaching issues after classroom observations.
3
2
Staff do not
interact after classroom observations.
1
School
conditions and capacities support the staff's arrangement as a
professional learning organization.
5a
Time is
arranged and committed for whole staff interactions.
5
4
Time is
arranged but frequently the staff fails to meet.
3
2
Staff cannot arrange time for interacting.
1
5b
The size,
structure, and arrangements of the school facilitate staff proximity
and interaction.
5
4
Considering
the size, structure, and arrangements of the school, the staff are
working to maximize their interaction.
3
2
The staff
takes no action to manage the facility and personnel for
interaction.
1
5c
A variety of
processes and procedures are used to encourage staff communication.
5
4
A single
communication method exists and is sometimes used to share
information.
3
2
Communication
devices are not given attention.
1
5d
Trust and
openness characterize all the staff.
5
4
Some of the
staff are trusting and open.
3
2
Trust and
openness do not exist among the staff.
1
5e
Caring,
collaborative, and productive relationships exist among all the
staff.
5
4
Caring and
collaboration are inconsistently demonstrated among the staff.
3
2
Staff are
isolated and work alone at their task.
1